Two Women Fighting Over Baby Mother Walks Away

I n the late afternoon of Fri 12 July 2013, in the calm, modern maternity wing of North Tyneside general hospital, sixteen-year-old Peter Bertram made a video of his mother property his newborn infant blood brother. Peter's video, made on his mother's telephone, lasts but over v minutes. In it, Annie Bertram, 33, sits in a hospital chair cradling her sleeping six-mean solar day-onetime son, Huw. Her long, chestnut hair is pulled back in a band; she looks exhausted. "Mamma'south just back from court," she says, in a soft geordie emphasis. "I tried actually hard to proceed yous. My barrister wanted me to agree to them taking you away, simply I said I would rather fight and lose, considering then at to the lowest degree I'd know I'd fought."

Annie strokes Huw'south tiny hand with one finger. "Delight don't ever think yous didn't mean the world to me. Considering you did. And you practise." Tears scroll downwards her cheeks. "And I and so want you lot to have a good life and to be happy, and I tin can't bear" – her phonation breaks – "the idea of anybody pain you." Huge sobs milkshake her. The baby, eyes airtight, sleeps on, his face turned peacefully towards his female parent.

Earlier that day, Annie had left the infirmary to attend Newcastle family courtroom in a last, desperate effort to exist allowed to go along her infant. Social workers at North Tyneside council had applied for an interim care society. If approved by a estimate, this would mean social services could remove Annie'south baby and put him into foster care, awaiting a longer-term plan for his future. Huw was Annie'south fifth child; iii of the others, aged seven, eight and 16, had been field of study to intendance applications at various points in their lives. Rosie, iv, spent periods with her father. In December 2012, as soon every bit social workers discovered Annie was pregnant, they told her they intended to remove the infant at birth.

Against accepted good practice, the hearing was in front end of a gauge unfamiliar with her history. "She was older, and looked very forbidding," Annie recalls. "She didn't look at me other than to go exasperated when I didn't sympathize a question." She was yet in hurting and bleeding from the birth, and her milk had come in and soaked her acme as she answered questions for an hour. Her barrister, whom she'd met but a few minutes earlier, didn't seem to her to fight very difficult: Annie felt he didn't have a grasp of her situation. "He asked me at one signal if I was a prostitute," she says bitterly.

Although counsel for the local authority acknowledged that Annie posed no immediate risk of harm to her baby, the debate continued for more than two hours, until Annie could comport no more and asked for permission to exit. At quarter past 7 that evening, a midwife came into Annie's hospital room. "I asked if it was time," Annie says. "She said, 'Aye' and gently took Huw out of my arms and quickly left the room. I only saw his fluffy trivial head going out the door." Annie's screams echoed through the corridors. The foster carer who came to the hospital to take the baby has told Annie she is still haunted by the sound.

The decease in 2007 of Peter Connelly, 17-month-old "Baby P", prompted a rapid ascension in the number of children taken into care. When it emerged that Peter, who died due to multiple injuries caused or immune past his female parent, her young man and his brother – was well known to Haringey social services, social workers were vilified by politicians and the press. Terror of being seen as responsible for "another Baby P" is thought to have contributed to a highly gamble-averse culture in children's services. This fear may be why the number of babies removed from their mothers at nascency has increased so quickly: according to professor Karen Broadhurst, it more than doubled between 2008 and 2013, from 802 to 2,018. By the end of March 2015, there were 69,540 children in local authority intendance.

Another factor is an increased focus on emotional damage. If proved on the residue of probabilities, adventure of this is an adequate basis for a UK court to sever a parent's legal bail with their kid. By 2013, the number of children on child-protection plans due to emotional corruption was more than six times as many as for sexual abuse, and most three times every bit many as for physical abuse.

Of the children who become involved in intendance proceedings, about four in 10 end upwardly in long-term foster intendance or are adopted; Broadhurst's research establish that just one in 10 babies removed at birth will be reunited with their mother. As Annie was to find, once a infant is taken into care, it can be extremely difficult to become them back.


S erious concerns about Annie's children had been raised two years before Huw's birth, in 2011. Annie, at 31, had been in a volatile human relationship with a human being who was controlling and occasionally violent. "Information technology was an abusive bike," she says. "He would drink, get angry at me, hit me, reject me. I would fall autonomously, he would leave, and then I would let him dorsum, because my self-esteem was then bloody low."

One dark in Nov 2011, unable to cope with the defoliation and distress, and trying to manage her children alone, Annie was overcome past panic. She needed urgently to become out of the house: "I just had to not be there."

She rang her close friend Jenna and asked her to come over urgently, to watch her children. Then, when she could hear Jenna's noisy automobile exhaust rounding the corner, she ran. Jenna arrived to find the younger children asleep and Peter playing on his Xbox, unaware that his mother had left (Rosie was with her begetter at the time). Afterwards a frantic search, and concerned about her friend's wellbeing, Jenna rang the constabulary. Annie was arrested and handcuffed on a road well-nigh her home, and taken to the law station, where she was put in a cell.

A duty solicitor advised Annie to accept a caution for child neglect; reluctantly, she did, after being told refusal would lead to a compulsory care order. Later that day, she signed a consent form for emergency care. Danny and Grace were temporarily fostered with a local family. Peter, then 15, was immune to stay at abode. Rosie stayed with her dad.

Anonymous woman with the son who was taken from her shortly after birth
Annie with Huw: her friends describe her as 'an astonishing female parent', 'incredibly engaged with her kids'.

Annie has no parental back up. She was sexually abused at the age of eight past a family member, but when she told her mother, normal life resumed as though nix had happened. At present, she finds, information technology is better to stay abroad from her family. "They are not good for my mental health."

She was sexually assaulted in her teens by a stranger, and past 15 she was self-harming and staying out all night. She left home and went to her grandmother's. After a period of sleeping rough, she walked into Northward Tyneside's council offices and asked children'south services for help. They found her a foster placement, but when she got pregnant, afterward a brief affair with a married man more than twice her age, the foster carer asked her to exit. Past 16, Annie was living in her own place, studying for GCSEs at college and caring for her baby. She was encouraged by her teachers to take A-levels, and found work in business cyberbanking, which she enjoyed. At 23, she got pregnant again.

Almost as soon every bit her baby daughter, Grace, was born, she was meaning again. Her boyfriend was unreliable, and when the babies were born he wanted nothing to exercise with them. It was a biting blow to Annie's hopes of creating a family.

A blueprint had been prepare. When she was living in relative stability as a lonely parent, or in the throes of a new relationship, Annie coped. Her friends draw her as "an amazing mother", "incredibly engaged with her kids". But when a relationship collapsed, so did her mental equilibrium. At her everyman points, Annie asked for help, and got it: North Tyneside social services stepped in, finding nurseries and respite childcare when they were airtight. The children's case files are now thick ring-folder folders of notes detailing case conferences, assessments and support packages.

In September 2007, after a breakdown in her human relationship with a man called Richie, Annie took an overdose while her children were in bed. She survived, but knew she needed urgent assistance and asked the council to accommodate Peter, Grace and Danny on a short-term ground. For iv months, until they returned to her care, Annie did intensive therapeutic work with her community psychiatric team, seeing her kids regularly all the while.

She describes her relationship with Richie as "volatile": she got pregnant, only he threw her out of his firm ii weeks before she gave birth to their girl Rosie, in October 2008. Her hard piece of work with the psychiatric team meant her mental health was more resilient, and newborn Rosie was discharged from hospital into Annie's intendance. The risk assessment on the older 3 was downgraded, and the instance after closed.

It was three years subsequently, at the cease of 2011, that Annie made her panicked bolt from home, and the children were once more accommodated by consent. During a contact outing with Danny and Grace in the boondocks center ane mean solar day, Danny begged her not to render him to his foster carers. He seemed frightened, and both brother and sister showed their mother bruising on their arms and legs. They said they were being pushed and shoved, and had fallen. Annie called the police to make an official complaint and, though the foster carers weren't charged, Annie withdrew her consent for their remaining in care. Both children moved back to live with her.

By the following leap, she was struggling once again. Her new boyfriend had asked her to ally him, but then bankrupt up with her. Visited at habitation by the pastoral mentor from her children's schoolhouse, Annie confessed that she wasn't coping. "And she said, 'Annie, you take to cope,'" she says.

2 days later, while the children were at school and nursery, Annie wrote a suicide annotation and took an overdose. Earlier she passed out, she rang her customs psychiatric nurse. She was nearly unconscious when the ambulance arrived, and was on a drip in infirmary for 24 hours. When she woke upward, she felt devastated it hadn't worked, before beingness hit past a moving ridge of "the deepest, almost painful, atrocious regret… and just desperation to be dorsum home with the kids, doing tea and the schoolhouse run."

Due north Tyneside's children'southward services decided Annie's volatile mental state and breakdowns were causing the children emotional harm, and applied to take them all into care. They accustomed that during the periods when Annie was well, she was able to meet the children'south needs, merely argued that "her mental health currently precluded her from doing and then on a long-term and anticipated basis".

A children's guardian, an contained professional appointed to correspond their best interests, agreed. Annie accepted that the children needed stability and didn't contest the application in April 2013, on the understanding that once she had completed a grade of therapy, and her mental wellness was stable, she would be applying for the children to come home. By this stage, she was pregnant once more and fighting for the right to be recognised as the new babe's mother.

Sitting on the floor of her small council flat on a hot day last August, Annie, slim and neat in black leggings and a flowered apparel, tucks her legs nether her. In November 2012, when she found she was meaning, she was told social workers were likely to apply to remove the baby at birth. She felt she had no option but to seek an abortion. "I went to the women's health unit and told them why I couldn't acquit to carry this child. The md went very tranquility. And they said, 'Abortion day is Wednesday.'"

The procedure was booked for 12 December; she would be 11 weeks meaning. "They said they would go on the baby and there would exist a burial on 2 January. And that," Annie's face crumples, "would be how my new yr would start."

Annie and Richie – with whom she nonetheless had an intermittent relationship, and whom she believed was the baby's begetter (a Deoxyribonucleic acid examination later showed he wasn't) – talked late into the night. They scrabbled together the money for a 3D scan because, Annie says, "I wanted to be able to say goodbye to my babe." Finally, Annie recalls, "Richie said, 'You lot can't do it. Yous won't survive this. And maybe they won't take him. Possibly we can fight.'"

But her children'southward social workers were, she felt, no longer interested in supporting her effort to keep the family together: they talked over her, she felt she was patronised; once, she was shouted at. The social worker later wrote in show given to the courtroom in February 2013: "I take had difficulty communicating with Ms Bertram following a meeting [when she] stated I had verbally attacked her." The social worker noted that Annie had missed 4 contact sessions with her children (though information technology was not noted that she had attended three contacts a week for nearly a yr).

In her evidence, Annie wrote: "At that coming together the social worker was so hostile to me that the contained reviewing officeholder had to intervene and ask [her] to be more moderate. She had made her personal dislike of me perfectly plainly." Annie admitted she had cancelled three contacts subsequently sessions with the assessing psychiatrist that had left her distraught, and missed one farther contact because she was unwell.

Annie was allowed to see Grace and Danny three times a week. On Wednesdays only, the four siblings could meet. At every ninety-minute session, a contact supervisor would observe and brand notes. It was not a relaxing environment: Annie knew that anything she said could be used in evidence virtually her ability to parent. She prepared carefully for these family sessions, scouring clemency shops for inexpensive board games and materials for craft activities. "Grace and Rosie would naturally gravitate towards each other, and sit at a table in the contact centre, making stuff together," she recalls. "Sometimes I brought a chess set, because Danny likes chess, and he'd often be stressed at the start. Playing chess together was a way of helping calm him downwards."

To reinforce its case that the new babe would not be safe, the council relied heavily on psychiatric and psychological reports commissioned for Annie's older children's care proceedings. Annie maintained that she had been mentally well for the best part of a year; social workers said there had been a deterioration. Damagingly, in their study to the court, they stated that "mother was referred to [her local] community mental wellness team simply has refused to engage on the footing that she does not trust any professionals. Mother would not work with her midwife and is no longer prepared to piece of work with social workers… She does not take responsibility for her difficulties."

A social worker previously employed by N Tyneside, who is at present an academic and asked non to be named, is in little doubtfulness that Annie's wariness of children's services was justified. "If you went hugger-mugger in a social work office for a week, you'd be horrified," he says. "I of the reasons I left is because of this bulldoze to take children away from their families – it's seen every bit not doing your task properly if you're non removing children." When asked to comment, North Tyneside council pointed out that its figures are "not out of stride with the national picture" and that its social workers are "actively encouraged to question our work with families at every phase, to support sensitive child-focused planning". But according to this ex-social worker, the view is "When in doubt, remove."


T here were 5,330 adoptions in England in the year catastrophe 31 March 2015 – a substantial rising on the number adopted in 2011, when the then didactics secretary Michael Gove demanded that more children should exist adopted, faster. Removing and then adopting a child based on a possible future danger has become highly contentious, peculiarly since the timescale for courts to decide on a kid's permanent future has been reduced to an outside limit of 26 weeks, leaving parents lilliputian leeway to show they take changed plenty to safely look after their child. The government does not collect figures on the number of forced adoptions: onetime "adoption tsar" Martin Narey says that only half of parents fight adoption correct to the bitter end; other family police experts suggest that many who are recorded as "non opposing" the concluding lodge may simply take had their will to fight ground down over months of legal wrangling.

In the months earlier Huw was born, Annie was diagnosed with emotional disorders that would require long-term therapy. I report said she should be reassessed after 12 months; a courtroom-appointed psychologist recommended two years of handling and commented on Annie's loftier levels of insight, which "bodes well for any futurity change". Yet children'due south services said her mental instability posed also high a take chances of serious emotional harm to her unborn baby.

Annie gave birth to Huw on 6 July 2013. 6 days later, around 8.30pm, after he was taken from her, she returned to her apartment grief-stricken and bereft. Night afterward night, unable to sleep after expressing breastmilk for her babe, she would look for advice online. Afterward a few weeks, she came beyond a blogpost with the heading "What should yous do if social services steal your children?"

The author, Andrew Pack, is a local authority lawyer who writes a popular family police blog, SuesspiciousMinds. "There are a lot of people who've had bad experiences with social workers – some because social workers have not treated them well and they're voicing genuine grievances, and some who've had a miserable time because they've not been able to modify," Pack tells me.

His blogpost explained that for parents to take any risk of getting their child back, they would need to demonstrate alter. "The question being asked is, given that ten has happened, are we going to requite these parents another attempt?" he says. "The other affair to ask – and nobody will tell you this – is, are the professionals involved rooting for you? Practise they like you lot? Are they optimistic about you? These are non the just factors, only they are things y'all can do something almost."

Annie read the post. Some time betwixt midnight and dawn, she left her flat and walked eastwards, not stopping until she reached a bench overlooking the waves crashing in from the Northward Body of water. The beach stretched out earlier her. She was convinced social workers had made up their minds about her, months earlier she gave nascency to Huw: this was where her working relationship with the quango had begun to break downward.

Anonymous woman with the son who was taken from her shortly after birth
'The parents who don't succeed, I encounter them sobbing on the court steps': Annie with Huw.

It is difficult and sometimes painful to change one's listen. It involves accepting we are fallible, and might have been wrong. In acknowledgment of this, social work students are taught to guard against a miracle known as confirmation bias, explains Brigid Featherstone, professor of social piece of work at the University of Huddersfield. "In a social work context, confirmation bias involves looking merely for evidence that confirms pre-existing views of a family, situation or issue," she says. "Moreover, people have a tendency to maintain their intuitive beliefs even when confronted by testify that challenges them."

Annie describes her relationship with social workers as broadly one of trust until the summertime of 2012, when they took legal action to put her older children into intendance. One social worker was "absolutely bright, a decent woman, who really tried to understand my family and supported us all". The moment children's services applied to a judge for intendance orders, however, Annie noticed an attitude change: new social workers got involved, whom she considered judgmental and biased.

"They'd decided what they thought of me," she says. "And they twisted what I told them, and sometimes they lied to brand me await as bad to the court every bit they possibly could." A spokesman for North Tyneside said, "These are very emotional bug and involve understandably stiff feelings, simply it would be incorrect to say the local say-so team take a full general position on any individual."

Annie is convinced information technology didn't affair what progress she made; North Tyneside's social workers would never believe she could change. And by the time she read Pack's blogpost, information technology had started to experience futile to try to convince them. "But that mail service gave me the tools to fight," she says. Her task from that point on, she resolved, was to work every bit hard equally she could to convince the other professionals involved in Huw's example that she had changed.


A nnie had been determined she wanted to breastfeed Huw. In the teeth of social workers' opposition, the judge who granted the lodge that he should exist removed as well allowed her to see him iii times a calendar week. Over the months that Huw remained in foster care, female parent and son bonded well.

Every kid in intendance proceedings has a children's guardian appointed, and in court their view is given considerable weight. Huw's guardian submitted her testify in Nov 2013. "She didn't only file her prove, she rang and told me," Annie says, smiling. The guardian had decided it would exist best for Huw to live with his mother, and that he should be returned home with "the minimum filibuster".

But past the time of the terminal court hearing, scheduled for five days in January 2014, the local say-so's plan remained the same: Huw should exist placed for adoption. The social workers' assessment was that Annie's history of periodic mental health crises meant she would put Huw at meaning gamble of emotional damage.

Just before the hearing, a judgment was handed down from the high court in London that restated in the strongest terms the statutory requirements that must exist met before the legal link between a parent and child may be severed. In his ruling in the landmark case now known as Re B-Southward, the president of the family division, Sir James Munby, alleged that adoption orders are "a very extreme matter, a concluding resort", and only to be made "in exceptional circumstances and… where nix else volition do".

Equally a result, North Tyneside's social workers had to submit a "Re B-Due south" statement to the court, to prove that their adoption plan did in fact come across the law. On 24-hour interval three of Huw's final hearing, after the guardian'southward show had been noted, and Annie had been cross-examined, information technology became credible that the social workers would have to rethink. "My legs went. I couldn't stand up," Annie says, remembering the moment the local authority's counsel conceded that adoption was no longer a viable prospect.

But Huw's case wasn't over however. "He had to look for 10 more weeks to come up home, because they kept coming back to court, and there was aught unlike in their plan," Annie says, aroused at the retentivity. By the fourth dimension of nevertheless another hearing, on 11 March 2014, a total two months after Approximate Simon Wood had been told adoption was no longer on the cards, the judge politely just definitively lost his temper. "It is merely unforgivable," Wood says on the courtroom recording, his voice controlled just furious.

The quango has since accepted responsibility for the unnecessary delay betwixt the hearings, though it maintains there was no intention to be obstructive. Wood twice told the courtroom that, should Annie seek an independent investigation of the quango's direction of Huw'due south case, he would be minded to grant it. Of the social workers' refusal to allow contact betwixt Grace and Danny and their infant brother – bar a single supervised hour, in a contact centre, merely after he was born – Judge Wood said to the social worker in court that it "beggars conventionalities".

"I do not meet this as a 'naught else will do' case," the judge said. "Every step taken [by the council]… has had to be forced upon it, and indeed the initiative has come not from the local authority, but from the mother herself." Wood reminded the council that, in a case like this, it was leap to provide the support services required to enable Huw to return home, whether it wanted to or non.


H uw came home on 27 March 2014, at about nine months old. His social worker handed him to Annie in the car park below her flat. "The foster carer sent me a text to say, 'Your son is on his fashion home where he belongs,'" Annie says, sobbing. The day before, Huw had been brought to her business firm for a contact visit with all his clothes and toys. Annie and the foster female parent had hugged and cried when they said adieu.

Nearly ii years on, life for this family is far from simple. Annie has sole responsibility for Huw, picks Rosie up from school and has her to stay three nights a week. She gets help from Peter, who has just turned 19 and was even so living at home last summertime, awaiting his A-level results. But Grace and Danny, at present 11 and 12, are still with foster carers, and their female parent describes the by three years of interest with North Tyneside children'southward services as "a consummate disaster for my family".

A spokesperson for N Tyneside council acknowledges that "Annie and her family have had a long and complicated relationship with the local say-so. Sometimes we have been helpful. Sometimes we have had to accept very difficult decisions. And sometimes we recognise we could have washed things differently and amend. Over the final couple of months we have sought to rebuild our relationship and to seek Annie'south assistance to permit her feel to positively influence our practice." In other words, there were lessons to be learned.

Peter, curled upwards on the sofa, says he believes older siblings are the forgotten victims of care proceedings. "That summer [when they took Huw] was brutal," he says. "I was xvi and in the eye of my GCSEs. I felt so lone – the strain was terrible. We were living on £50 a week, eating 15p noodles heated up in a pan. Pour on some sauce and that was dinner."

He huddles into himself. "I don't want to get to court or fight the local authority. I don't want to be part of that world. Obviously, I accept quite a big problem with dominance now. If you go through this kind of thing, you lose trust. We've been completely torn apart as a family. We will never, all of us, alive under the same roof."

Peter looks up through a floppy quiff. "I haven't seen Grace and Danny in weeks," he says. "It's getting to the bespeak now that I don't experience connected to them any more." He pauses. "I'chiliad exhausted. And I can't see a way out."

Grace and Danny have been in long-term foster care for nearly four years. Though Annie was discharged from mental health services before Huw was removed, the council is adamant that this is where they will remain. Annie acknowledges that she allow her children downwards badly when she was ill; simply she believes they have lost trust in her considering of the position social workers take put her in. While Huw was still in council care, she and Peter were told not to tell Grace and Danny that their infant brother was spending long periods of time at the family home. "They made me lie to my children, who of course would wonder why on earth their baby brother was coming home when they couldn't," Annie says. "And social services made Peter lie to them, besides." When this betoken was raised in court, Guess Forest fabricated clear his outrage at "the impossible position" in which the local authorization had placed Annie – and especially Peter, "who is still a child". Annie was, finally, permitted to explain to Grace and Danny that Huw, whom they had seen simply in one case, would live with her, while the council had decided they would not. Social workers, Annie believes, have never looked positively at the prospect of Grace and Danny coming home – and, in the past few months, the children have started to say they don't desire to.

On Huw's kickoff birthday, Annie held a party at a soft play centre near her home. "Everyone who'd helped me through the court case came; Grace and Danny, too." At first, their social worker had refused to let them come, considering it was a weekend and at that place was no contact supervisor to monitor them. So Annie threatened to become to court and they backed downward. "Grace wouldn't leave my side," Annie says. "She held me and I could feel her shaking. I said, 'What'southward wrong?' Simply I knew what was wrong. And she said, 'I empathize now, Mam. I sympathize that you had to fight for him first.'" Annie's vocalism cracks. "She understood that I couldn't fight for them to come home at the same time as doing what I had to do to go Huw back. And so Grace and Danny have been the sacrifice. That, and nearly all of Huw's showtime year."

Annie has now started a website for parents who find themselves in her situation, Surviving Safeguarding, and helps to train social workers. "I can't begin to think…" She trails off. "If I'd lost him. For the parents who don't succeed, and when I go to court, I come across them crying in the toilets, sobbing on the steps, considering they've lost their children. Your life is over and no 1 gives a damn. You only get dropped. That's what has to change."

matavithembity.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/feb/20/children-taken-into-care-mother-fighting-to-get-baby-back-louise-tickle

0 Response to "Two Women Fighting Over Baby Mother Walks Away"

Postar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel